Generational Wealth

Generational Wealth

Generational wealth, robbed from the de la Garza families. Not sure how long ago it sold, but my math says Antonio's 1/2 League (2,214 acres), would have fetched just north of $14,000,000...
Mark


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Seeing Connections

Image
What I'm trying to aim at and hit the mark repetitively, is the idea of " connections ." We've come so far these past few months. The psychology of this story, the sentiment, the tendencies and biased assumptions is what galvanizes me. I discovered a little snippet of a  connection . But I want you to hear it till it is obviously glaring as a fact. So, here's a small gem that I discovered during my lunch break. Of you course you have to remember that the  Mrs. Fagan  is driving these discoveries at the moment. lol In the post reconstruction, following the Civil War many in the community were grateful to and hailed these men as heroes who had fought in the confederacy. So, here's the snippet. Refugio's Judge Rea voted " Major Rogers,  Captain Scott  and  Thomas O'Connor  as the three most outstanding citizens of the county who were personally known to him. " This is probably circa 1867, just 8 years before they came after Antonio de la Garza. ...
Read more

Proof

Image
Proof Further proof of "guilty by association." In the previous postings title Truth, I spoke of the toxic, overzealous and aggressive town hall meetings. Well, look no further than the proof that  Henry Scott ,  James Power  and  Thomas O'Connor  all comingled with each other. They were all part of the townsfolk trying to protect the "good old titles." As I've said from the beginning, Henry "Hank" Scott was the rich prominent rancher who ran vigilante group in the area. He's the only one people. I have copies of Henry's land dealings with Thomas O'Connor. Now look, they were present together in meetings. Bingo.
Read more

Multiplier Effect

Image
Multiplier Effect I guess when I'm getting at in regard to that last post is that the loss of the land has a sort of multiplier effect. There's no way to forecast or use what we'd call, using a crystal ball, that would tell us what revenue streams would have come in. The fact that the land in all likelihood cost $14,000,000 + at this point is true. It doesn't include any oil or mineral rights underneath the ground. It doesn't include cattle and horse ranching operations. I mean if memory serves me right, you would have to extrapolate nearly 150 years back to generate an accurate picture. It ain't going to happen, but just goes to show you that had it continued and had he prospered with his cattle and horses, even branched out into other activities, the total value lost easily would exceed $14,000,000. Again, this is another reason why it's worth fighting for, and to let those gringos know they economically hurt many of the original vaqueros who were supposed...
Read more